profile

Chatomics! — The Bioinformatics Newsletter

Bulk vs. Single-Cell RNA-seq: Use the Right Tool, Not the Flashy One


Hello Bioinformatics lovers,

Tommy here. I was on the bioinformatics lab podcast. Check it out if you want to hear my story.

Today, we will talk about single-cell RNAseq. (btw, I made this PCA and CCA for cell annotation tutorial for you)

You don’t always need single-cell RNA-seq.


In fact, in many cases, it’s the wrong tool for the job.

We get it—single-cell RNA-seq is hot. It feels cutting-edge. But too often, researchers jump to it without asking a critical question:

Is this the best method for answering my hypothesis?


Bulk RNA-seq Isn’t Dead—It’s Just Overlooked

Despite the hype, bulk RNA-seq remains:

  • Cheaper
  • Simpler
  • Statistically stronger with replicates

If your samples are already purified or sorted—like FACS-isolated T cells—do you really need the extra noise and complexity of single-cell?


Where Bulk RNA-seq Still Wins

✔️ Homogeneous samples (like cell lines)
✔️ High-throughput designs with many conditions
✔️ Studies where replication is key (e.g., drug treatments, time-course)
✔️ Situations where per-cell resolution won’t change your biological conclusion


But What If I Do Need Single-Cell?

Use scRNA-seq if your question depends on:

  • Detecting rare populations
  • Disentangling heterogeneous tissues
  • Discovering cell-type-specific signals

In these cases, resolution matters—and scRNA-seq earns its price tag.

But know this: you’re trading off simplicity, QC, and replicability.


The Budget Dilemma No One Talks About

Say you’ve got the money for:

  • One scRNA-seq run across 4 conditions
    OR
  • Triplicate bulk RNA-seq across the same 4 conditions

Which is better?

Replication wins almost every time.
It gives you confidence in what you see, not just pretty plots.


Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Method

  • What’s my biological question?
  • Do I need per-cell resolution to answer it?
  • Will replication give me more power?
  • Can I simplify without compromising insight?

Science isn’t about chasing trends—it’s about chasing truth.


TL;DR — Key Takeaways

✅ Use single-cell RNA-seq when resolution is truly needed
✅ Use bulk RNA-seq when replication, simplicity, and cost matter more
✅ Let your question—not the technology—guide your methods


Action Items

  1. Define your hypothesis clearly
  2. Match your method to your biology, not the latest buzzword
  3. Don’t default to scRNA-seq just because it’s “cool”

What method did you use in your last study?
Hit reply—I’d love to hear your thought process.


Other posts that you may find helpful

  1. untaught skill: how to name files.
  2. Two types of bioinformaticians walk into a lab. One scales to 10,000 genomes. the other dissects one elegant experiment.
  3. Last Sunday, we went sea fishing with a group of Chinese professionals from Yale. One of them suffered severe seasickness.
  4. You’re merging gene data across tools. Suddenly nothing matches ENSEMBL, ENTREZ, TP53, P53... Why so many gene IDs?
  5. The biomarker test could change a patient’s life. What is it? 🧵
  6. Bioinformaticians: our people skills matters as much as our code. Here’s why communication is your most underrated tool 🧵
  7. Think early cancer trials are where breakthroughs begin? The truth is harder. Here’s what you want to know 🧵
  8. Your genomics analysis is only as good as your reference. Use the wrong genome build, and you’ll misplace peaks, CpG sites, and genes. Here's why that matters 🧵
  9. what happens when you meet someone in person after knowing each other for over 10 years online?
  10. You love R for bioinformatics. You live in Unix. So why not turn your R scripts into command-line tools? Here’s why you should.
  11. Drug development is brutal. Not because we lack smart people—but because we lack good models. Here's why that matters, deeply.
  12. You're not just sequencing single cells. You're sequencing the soup they're in. Ambient RNA is everywhere in single-cell RNA-seq. Here's how to fix it.
  13. 100 million cells in a single-cell study sounds massive. But do you know how many cells are in one human body? Try 30 trillion.
  14. Can you trust a boxplot with a small sample size? Not always. The median might lie to you. Let’s simulate why, with R code.
  15. You will stand out ahead of 99% of the people in anything if you do the following

Happy Learning!

Tommy aka crazyhottommy

PS:

If you want to learn Bioinformatics, there other ways that I can help:

  1. My free YouTube Chatomics channel, make sure you subscribe to it.
  2. I have many resources collected on my github here.
  3. I have been writing blog posts for over 10 years https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/

Stay awesome!

Chatomics! — The Bioinformatics Newsletter

Why Subscribe?✅ Curated by Tommy Tang, a Director of Bioinformatics with 100K+ followers across LinkedIn, X, and YouTube✅ No fluff—just deep insights and working code examples✅ Trusted by grad students, postdocs, and biotech professionals✅ 100% free

Share this page