Why AI Isn’t Enough (Yet)

AI can generate fast, elegant code — but often without understanding the biological logic behind it. A recent benchmark (BioCoder) shows that even ChatGPT-4 scores only 50% accuracy on complex bioinformatics tasks.

80% of AI-generated bioinformatics code requires human correction.

This means your expertise is more important than ever. AI can be an assistant — but only if you can spot the errors it doesn’t know it’s making.

Common AI Mistakes in Bioinformatics

Before diving into the five core skills, here are common red flags in AI-generated code:

• Off-by-one errors: e.g., treating 0-based coordinates as 1-based
• Strand orientation confusion: ignoring 5’ to 3’ directionality
• File format mix-ups: VCF vs GFF vs BED vs SAM/BAM
• Misapplied statistics: running t-tests on non-normal data
• Memory disasters: loading whole genomes instead of streaming data

Skill #1: Know Your Data Formats

Bioinformatics is filled with diverse file types — FASTQ, BAM, VCF, GTF, BED — and each one has quirks. You need to:

• Recognize single-end vs paired-end reads
• Interpret quality scores in FASTQ
• Understand how coordinates are indexed in BED (0-based) vs VCF (1-based)

AI might run the code, but if it misreads a file, it might quietly corrupt your results.

Skill #2: Understand Statistics (Deeply)

Don’t let AI misuse statistical methods. Know:

• When to use t-tests vs non-parametric tests
• Why variance stabilization matters in DESeq2
• How to correct for multiple testing with FDR
• The meaning and difference between TPM, RPKM, and raw counts

Bad stats = beautiful graphs with meaningless results.

Skill #3: Biological Validation

AI doesn’t know that a protein must be divisible by three codons to be valid. You do. Use your biological knowledge to catch logic errors:

• Reverse complements must be correct (5’ to 3’)
• Splice sites should follow GT-AG rules
• Cell-type-specific expression should make sense (e.g., surfactant proteins don’t belong in nuclei)

Skill #4: Review Code Like a Scientist

Here’s a quick AI code review checklist:

• Are all parameters clearly defined?
• Does the script run without errors?
• Does it handle empty files or edge cases?
• Is the code reproducible?
• Is it version controlled and commented?

When AI gives you something, don’t just copy-paste it. Inspect it. Stress-test it. Own it.

Skill #5: Build Tests Like a Wet Lab Scientist

Don’t trust AI pipelines until they pass positive and negative controls:

• Variant calling? Use known reference variants from Genome in a Bottle.
• Sequence alignment? Identical sequences should score 100% similarity. Random ones shouldn’t.
• Gene expression? Make sure housekeeping genes behave as expected.

Think of this like bench science — every experiment needs controls.

Final Thoughts: Use AI, But Don’t Trust It Blindly

What to do next:

1. Trust, but verify everything AI gives you.
2. Document your prompts and outputs for reproducibility.
3. Stay grounded in fundamentals — file formats, biology, stats, code structure.
4. Connect with the community: Share, discuss, and learn from others.
5. Let AI amplify your skills — not replace your judgment.

AI is your assistant, not your replacement.

Bioinformatics in the age of AI will reward those who know both how to prompt and how to question the answers.

Want more? Check out my newsletter for weekly bioinformatics tips and coding insights.