Hello Bioinformatics lovers,

Merry Christmas if you celebrate it. If not, Happy New Year! (Most of you should celebrate it).

Today, let's talk about choosing bioinformatics tools.

You're comparing DESeq2 benchmarks for the third week in a row.

Your data is still sitting there, untouched. Sound familiar?

Here's the uncomfortable truth: You don't need the perfect tool. You just need to start.

The real cost of tool paralysis

I've watched researchers spend more time debating STAR versus HISAT2 than actually analyzing their RNA-seq data.

The irony? Both aligners achieve ~95% alignment rates. The biological conclusions would be nearly identical.

That 5% accuracy difference you're hunting? It rarely changes your findings.

But the weeks lost to indecision? That's research time you'll never get back.

A better framework for tool selection

Instead of chasing perfection, ask yourself:

Can I install it in under an hour? If you're wrestling with broken dependencies on day one, move on. Momentum matters more than marginal gains.

Does it fit my ecosystem? Working in R? Seurat is excellent for single-cell analysis. Prefer Python? Scanpy does the same job. Pick the one that matches your workflow and expertise.

Is it actively maintained? A Nature Methods paper from 2018 doesn't help if the GitHub repo hasn't been updated in 3 years. Look for active communities, clear documentation, and recent commits.

The practical test

Run a pilot with a data subset. Pick 2 tools maximum. See which one integrates smoothly into your pipeline. Then commit and move forward.

Example: Choosing an aligner for RNA-seq? STAR runs faster but uses more RAM. HISAT2 is more memory-efficient but slower. The "best" choice depends entirely on your system constraints—not some abstract benchmark.

Your decision criteria should be: "Which one can I run successfully today?"

What actually matters

Your science isn't judged on whether you used the theoretically optimal algorithm.

It's judged on whether your biological story is clear, your methods are sound, and your results are reproducible.

The algorithm is a means to an answer—not the answer itself.

Your action item

If you're stuck choosing between tools right now:

1. Pick the two most recommended options
2. Run a small test dataset through each (today, not next week)
3. Choose the one that works smoothly with your setup
4. Move forward with your actual analysis

The best tool is the one you'll actually use.

Stop researching. Start analyzing.

Happy Learning!

Tommy aka crazyhottommy

You can always find my previous week's posts on LinkedIn here https://www.linkedin.com/in/%F0%9F%8E%AF-ming-tommy-tang-40650014/recent-activity/all/​

PS:

Forward this email to a friend if you think they will find it helpful.

If you want to learn Bioinformatics, there are other ways that I can help:

1. My free YouTube Chatomics channel, make sure you subscribe to it.
2. I have many resources collected on my github here.
3. I have been writing blog posts for over 10 years https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/​

Stay awesome!